Federalism Katrina and FEMA

FEMA and Federalism

FEMA and Federalism

by Cayci Swisher -
Number of replies: 3

1)      What role did the National, State and Local Governments have in preventing, mitigating and reacting to Hurricane Katrina?

The National, State, and Local government couldn’t prevent the Hurricane, however, the National government, in the past had preformed a simulation hurricane like Katrina called Pam. They ended up cutting pam because it cost too much money, but still had a plan nevertheless. The State governments demanded standards and had, in the past, asked for troops to be brought in for help. I feel that the local government didn’t do anything to mitigate or react to hurricane Katrina because they relied mostly on the State and National government.

2)      Evaluate how each level of government performed its duties. Be specific and back up your points with facts and logic.

The National government preformed it’s duties by earlier in the year sending states in need 8.1 million dollars for communication problems so the local and state government could keep in touch, however the local and state governments spent it on items they didn’t really need such as new items for their city. The State government didn’t really preform any duties, the most they did was ask for troops. The Local government preformed it’s duties by urgently asking the National government for aid.

3)      After reading the "FEMA and federalism" article, take a stand about the role of the federal government in natural disasters.

I believe that The National government hasn’t put in as much effort, into fixing FEMA, as they could. As the article said, “congress should help FEMA prepare for catastrophes, not just emergencies, and look for what causes major disasters.”  President Jimmy Carter created FEMA to provide federal aid after local disasters; I believe it’s up to the National government to help out with major catastrophes. FEMA worked well during President Carter and Clinton’s term, however, during the presidency of George W. Bush, Bush cut FEMA down to a small branch of the Department of Homeland Security. FEMA’s activity soon tripled as the staff was reduced by 20%. FEMA lacked preparation and funds for one of the biggest catastrophic events America has ever experienced, Hurricane Katrina. FEMA has spent most of its money and time on the latest routine disasters. I think the National government should help fix FEMA quicker and help them focus on major catastrophes rather than smaller disasters.

In reply to Cayci Swisher

Re: FEMA and Federalism

by Anarida Delaj -

I completely agree with what you are saying, especially on the fact that the national government hasn't really tried to fix FEMA. The national government is more like ignoring it's existence and it appears as if they are slowly trying to remove it. Employement has decreased and the focus is no longer placed on major catastrophes. If the government had actually continued to try to maintain FEMA in a high position, it is possible that many victims of Hurricane Katrina could have been saved.

In reply to Cayci Swisher

Re: FEMA and Federalism

by Courtney Gillis -

I agree that the local governmnet relied too heavily on the state and national government. I think that each level of government needs to be planned efficiently for natural disasters, that way they won't have to rely on FEMA as much which will greatly improve FEMA. I also agree that FEMA needs to be fixed. I think that the national government used FEMA as a way to gain votes and make the white house seems active. That's not running a program efficiently or doing anything for the common good. A government, no matter what level, needs to stop playing political games and do what's best for its citizens.